Some students are athletes. All athletes are healthy. Which conclusion necessarily follows?
Correct: B
From 'Some S are A' and 'All A are H', we can conclude 'Some S are H' by the chain rule. The particular affirmative premise ensures that at least some students share the property of being athletes, and since all athletes are healthy, those students are also healthy. This is a valid syllogism (DAR-3 in figure 3). The other options either reverse the relationship or make unsupported negative claims.